当前课程知识点:光影中的文本 >  第四章 光影中的精神世界 >  4.4 格式塔心理学派 >  格式塔心理学派

返回《光影中的文本》慕课在线视频课程列表

格式塔心理学派在线视频

格式塔心理学派

The view is sometimes summarized using the adage, "the whole is more than the sum of its parts." Gestalt principles, proximity, similarity, figure-ground, continuity, closure, and connection, determine how humans perceive visuals in connection with different objects and environments.

Max Wertheimer (1880–1943), Kurt Koffka (1886–1941), and Wolfgang Köhler (1887–1967) founded Gestalt psychology in the early 20th century. The dominant view in psychology at the time was structuralism, exemplified by the work of Hermann von Helmholtz (1821–1894), Wilhelm Wundt (1832–1920), and Edward B. Titchener (1867–1927). Structuralism was rooted firmly in British empiricism and was based on three closely interrelated theories: (1) "atomism," also known as "elementalism," the view that all knowledge, even complex abstract ideas, is built from simple, elementary constituents, (2) "sensationalism," the view that the simplest constituents—the atoms of thought—are elementary sense impressions, and (3) "associationism," the view that more complex ideas arise from the association of simpler ideas. Together, these three theories give rise to the view that the mind constructs all perceptions and even abstract thoughts strictly from lower-level sensations that are related solely by being associated closely in space and time. The Gestaltists took issue with this widespread "atomistic" view that the aim of psychology should be to break consciousness down into putative basic elements. In contrast, the Gestalt psychologists believed that breaking psychological phenomena down into smaller parts would not lead to understanding psychology.  The Gestalt psychologists believed, instead, that the most fruitful way to view psychological phenomena is as organized, structured wholes.  They argued that the psychological "whole" has priority and that the "parts" are defined by the structure of the whole, rather than vice versa. One could say that the approach was based on a macroscopic view of psychology rather than a microscopic approach. Gestalt theories of perception are based on human nature being inclined to understand objects as an entire structure rather than the sum of its parts. 

Wertheimer had been a student of Austrian philosopher, Christian von Ehrenfels (1859–1932), a member of the School of Brentano. Von Ehrenfels introduced the concept of Gestalt to philosophy and psychology in 1890, before the advent of Gestalt psychology as such. Von Ehrenfels observed that a perceptual experience, such as perceiving a melody or a shape, is more than the sum of its sensory components. He claimed that, in addition to the sensory elements of the perception, there is something extra. Although in some sense derived from the organization of the component sensory elements, this further quality is an element in its own right. He called it Gestalt-qualität or "form-quality." For instance, when one hears a melody, one hears the notes plus something in addition to them that binds them together into a tune – the Gestalt-qualität. It is this Gestalt-qualität that, according to von Ehrenfels, allows a tune to be transposed to a new key, using completely different notes, while still retaining its identity. The idea of a Gestalt-qualität has roots in theories by David Hume, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Immanuel Kant, David Hartley, and Ernst Mach. Both von Ehrenfels and Edmund Husserl seem to have been inspired by Mach's work Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen (Contributions to the Analysis of Sensations, 1886), in formulating their very similar concepts of gestalt and figural moment, respectively.

Through a series of experiments, Wertheimer discovered that a person observing a pair of alternating bars of light can, under the right conditions, experience the illusion of movement between one location and the other. He noted that this was a perception of motion absent any moving object. That is, it was pure phenomenal motion. He dubbed it phi ("phenomenal") motion. Wertheimer's publication of these results in 1912 marks the beginning of Gestalt psychology.  In comparison to von Ehrenfels and others who had used the term "gestalt" earlier in various ways, Wertheimer's unique contribution was to insist that the "gestalt" is perceptually primary. The gestalt defines the parts from which it is composed, rather than being a secondary quality that emerges from those parts. Wertheimer took the more radical position that "what is given me by the melody does not arise ... as a secondary process from the sum of the pieces as such. Instead, what takes place in each single part already depends upon what the whole is", (1925/1938). In other words, one hears the melody first and only then may perceptually divide it up into notes. Similarly, in vision, one sees the form of the circle first—it is given "im-mediately" (i.e., its apprehension is not mediated by a process of part-summation). Only after this primary apprehension might one notice that it is made up of lines or dots or stars.

The two men who served as Wertheimer's subjects in the phi experiments were Köhler and Koffka. Köhler was an expert in physical acoustics, having studied under physicist Max Planck (1858–1947), but had taken his degree in psychology under Carl Stumpf (1848–1936). Koffka was also a student of Stumpf's, having studied movement phenomena and psychological aspects of rhythm. In 1917, Köhler (1917/1925) published the results of four years of research on learning in chimpanzees. Köhler showed, contrary to the claims of most other learning theorists, that animals can learn by "sudden insight" into the "structure" of a problem, over and above the associative and incremental manner of learning that Ivan Pavlov (1849–1936) and Edward Lee Thorndike (1874–1949) had demonstrated with dogs and cats, respectively.

The terms "structure" and "organization" were focal for the Gestalt psychologists. Stimuli were said to have a certain structure, to be organized in a certain way, and that it is to this structural organization, rather than to individual sensory elements, that the organism responds. When an animal is conditioned, it does not simply respond to the absolute properties of a stimulus, but to its properties relative to its surroundings. To use a favorite example of Köhler's, if conditioned to respond in a certain way to the lighter of two gray cards, the animal generalizes the relation between the two stimuli rather than the absolute properties of the conditioned stimulus: it will respond to the lighter of two cards in subsequent trials even if the darker card in the test trial is of the same intensity as the lighter one in the original training trials.

In 1921, Koffka published a Gestalt-oriented text on developmental psychology, Growth of the Mind. With the help of American psychologist Robert Ogden, Koffka introduced the Gestalt point of view to an American audience in 1922 by way of a paper in Psychological Bulletin. It contains criticisms of then-current explanations of a number of problems of perception, and the alternatives offered by the Gestalt school. Koffka moved to the United States in 1924, eventually settling at Smith College in 1927. In 1935, Koffka published his Principles of Gestalt Psychology. This textbook laid out the Gestalt vision of the scientific enterprise as a whole. Science, he said, is not the simple accumulation of facts. What makes research scientific is the incorporation of facts into a theoretical structure. The goal of the Gestaltists was to integrate the facts of inanimate nature, life, and mind into a single scientific structure. This meant that science would have to accommodate not only what Koffka called the quantitative facts of physical science but the facts of two other "scientific categories": questions of order and questions of Sinn, a German word which has been variously translated as significance, value, and meaning. Without incorporating the meaning of experience and behavior, Koffka believed that science would doom itself to trivialities in its investigation of human beings.


(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_psychology)


下一节:影视摄影创作中的格式塔奠基

返回《光影中的文本》慕课在线视频列表

光影中的文本课程列表:

第一章 光影中的画面造型技艺

-1.1 景别

--景别

--景别

--五个景别

--景别

-1.2 焦距

--焦距

--焦距

-1.3 光线

--影视光线的分类

--影视光线的表现形势及作用

--光线

-1.4 色彩

--色彩

--色彩

第二章 光影中的声音造型技艺

-2.1 声音的分类

--纪录片中声音的分类

--故事片中声音的分类

--声音的分类

-2.2 声音真实感的五要素

--声音真实感的五要素

--声音真实感的五要素

-2.3 电影音乐

--电影音乐

--电影音乐

-2.4 电影声音对叙事情节的建构功能

--声音的呈现方式

--声音特性

--声音作为建构叙事情节的元素

--声音建构

第三章 光影中的社会倒影

-3.1 时代与美——新媒体时代传统文化美学的呈现方式

--新媒体时代传统文化美学的呈现方式

--时代与美——新媒体时代传统文化美学的呈现方式

-3.2 纪录片的拍摄要素——以《180台DV的故事》为例

--DV的故事

--180台DV的故事

-3.3 纪录片对社会的关注和思考

--纪录片对社会的关注和思考

--纪录片对社会的关注和思考

-3.4 纪录片的公益力量

--纪录片的公益力量

--纪录片的公益力量

第四章 光影中的精神世界

-4.1 行为主义心理学派

--行为主义学派心理

--行为主义心理学派

-4.1.1 行为主义:场理论在影视中的刺激与传播作用

--行为主义:场理论在影视中的刺激与传播作用

--场理论

-4.2 皮亚杰学派

--皮亚杰学派

--皮亚杰学派

-4.2.1 影视观众图式的同化顺应学说结合影视运用

--影视观众图式的同化顺应学说结合影视运用

--影视观众图式的同化顺应学说结合影视运用

-4.2.2 影视观众接受图式对影视接受的影响和制约

--影视观众接受图式对影视接受的影响和制约

--接受图式

-4.3 人本主义心理学派

--人本主义心理学派

--人本主义心理学派

-4.3.1 影视作品中人物性格塑造的本源依据

--影视作品中人物性格塑造的本源依据

--本源依据

-4.4 格式塔心理学派

--格式塔心理学派

--格式塔心理学

-4.4.1 影视摄影创作中的格式塔奠基

--影视摄影创作中的格式塔奠基

--格式塔奠基

-4.4.2 影视作品中生活与艺术表现的连接

--影视作品中生活与艺术表现的连接

--影视作品中生活与艺术表现的连接

-4.5 精神分析学派:弗洛伊德潜意识理论

--精神分析学派:弗洛伊德潜意识理论

--弗洛伊德潜意识理论

-4.5.1 潜意识理论对影视作品的创作启示

--潜意识理论对影视作品的创作启示

--潜意识理论对影视作品的创作启示

-4.5.2 影视作品中故事发展的源动力——本能

--影视作品中故事发展的源动力——本能

--本能

-4.5.3 影视作品中人物发展的依据——情结

--影视作品中人物发展的依据——情结

--情结

第五章 光影中的梦幻呈现

-5.1 戏曲音乐要素在纪录片中的应用

--戏曲音乐要素在纪录片中的应用

--戏曲音乐要素在纪录片中的应用

-5.2 航拍类作品的成功之道

--航拍类作品的成功之道

--航拍类作品的成功之道

-5.3 “讲故事”——当今纪录片创作的必然选择

--“讲故事”——当今纪录片创作的必然选择

--讲故事——当今纪录片创作的必然选择

-5.4 声音艺术创作分析

--声音艺术创作分析

--声音艺术创作分析

格式塔心理学派笔记与讨论

也许你还感兴趣的课程:

© 柠檬大学-慕课导航 课程版权归原始院校所有,
本网站仅通过互联网进行慕课课程索引,不提供在线课程学习和视频,请同学们点击报名到课程提供网站进行学习。