批判性思维

批判性思维的课程指导学生对自我的批判性思维意识和能力进行检视和反思,教授与引导学生转换现有思维、发现问题、寻找漏洞、提出质疑、检验证据、提出假设、组织辩护,可以应用于一切题材、所有学科。

开设学校:湖北大学;学科:哲学、

批判性思维课程:前往报名学习

批判性思维视频慕课课程简介:

批判性思维的课程指导学生对自我的批判性思维意识和能力进行检视和反思,教授与引导学生转换现有思维、发现问题、寻找漏洞、提出质疑、检验证据、提出假设、组织辩护,可以应用于一切题材、所有学科。

前往报名学习

批判性思维课程列表:

{{'上次学习:'+learn_list['HUBU01011001489']['last_leaf_name']}}

1. Orientation

-1.1 What Is Critical Thinking?

--1.1 What is Critical Thinking?

-1.2 Why Study Critical Thinking?

--1.2 Why Study Critical Thinking?

-Quiz 1

-Critical Thinking: Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes

--html

2. Basics of Critical Thinking

-2.1 Claims

--2.1 Claims

-2.2 Issues

--2.2 Issues

-2.3 Arguments

--2.3 Arguments

-2.4 Identifying Premise and Conclusion

--2.4 Identifying Premise and Conclusion

-2.5 What Arguments Are Not

--2.5 What Arguments Are Not

-Quiz 2

-Lecture 2 Reading

3. Two Kinds of Reasoning

-3.1 Two Kinds of Arguments

--3.1 Two Kinds of Arguments

-3.2 Distinguishing Deductive and Inductive Arguments

--3.2 Distinguishing Deductive and Inductive Arguments

-3.3 Validity and Soundness of Deductive Arguments

--3.3 Validity and Soundness of Deductive Arguments

-3.4 Strength of Inductive Arguments

--3.4 Strength of Inductive Arguments

-3.5 Techniques for Understanding Arguments

--3.5 Techniques for Understanding Arguments

-Quiz 3

-Lecture 3 Reading

4. Clarity

-4.1 Clarity, Precision, Accuracy, and Relevance

--4.1 Clarity, Precision, Accuracy, and Relevance

-4.2 Consistency, Logical Correctness, Completeness, and Fairness

--4.2 Consistency, Logical Correctness, Completeness, and Fairness

-4.3 Vagueness

--4.3 Vagueness

-4.4 Ambiguity

--4.4 Ambiguity

-4.5 Generality

--4.5 Generality

-4.6 Defining Terms

--4.6 Defining Terms

-Quiz 4

-Lecture 4 Reading

5. Clear Writing

-5.1 Tasks before Writing

--5.1 Tasks before Writing

-5.2 Writing Argumentative Essays

--5.2 Writing Argumentative Essays

-5.3 Essay Types to Avoid

--5.3 Essay Types to Avoid

-Quiz 5

-Lecture 5 Reading

6. Credibility

-6.1 A Few Words on Credibility

--6.1 A Few Words on Credibility

-6.2 Credibility of the Claim

--6.2.1 Credibility of the Direct Observation

--6.2.2 Credibility of Background Information

-6.3 Credibility of the source

--6.3 Credibility of the source

-Quiz 6

-Lecture 6 Reading

7. Persuasion through Rhetoric

-7.1 What Is Rhetoric Device and Why Use Rhetoric?

--7.1 What Is Rhetoric Device and Why Use Rhetoric?

-7.2 Euphemisms and Dysphemisms

--7.2 Euphemisms and Dysphemisms

-7.3 Weaslers, Downplayers, Hyperbole

--7.3 Weaslers, Downplayers, Hyperbole

-7.4 Stereotypes

--7.4 Stereotypes

-7.5 Innuendo, Loaded Questions, Ridicule and Sarcasm

--7.5 Innuendo, Loaded Questions, Ridicule and Sarcasm

-7.6 Rhetorical Definitions and Rhetorical Explanations; Rhetorical Analogies

--7.6 Rhetorical Definitions and Rhetorical Explanations; Rhetorical Analogies

-7.7 Misleading Comparisons

--7.7 Misleading Comparisons

-7.8 Proof Surrogates; Repetition

--7.8 Proof Surrogates; Repetition

-Quiz 7

-Lecture 7 Reading

8. Psychological and Related Fallacies

-8.1 Argument from outrage, Argument from Pity, Argument from Envy

--8.1 Argument from outrage, Argument from Pity, Argument from Envy

-8.2 Scare Tactics, Apple Polishing

--8.2 Scare Tactics, Apple Polishing

-8.3 Guilt Trip, Wishful Thinking, Rationalizing

--8.3 Guilt Trip, Wishful Thinking, Rationalizing

-8.4 Groupthink Fallacy, Nationalism, Peer Pressure

--8.4 Groupthink Fallacy, Nationalism, Peer Pressure

-8.5 Appeal to Popularity, Appeal to Common Practice, Appeal to Tradition

--8.5 Appeal to Popularity, Appeal to Common Practice, Appeal to Tradition

-8.6 Red Herring, Two Wrongs Make a Right

--8.6 Red Herring, Two Wrongs Make a Right

-Quiz 8

-Lecture 8 Reading

9. More Fallacies

-9.1 The Ad Hominem Fallacy

--9.1.1 Personal Attack Ad Hominem

--9.1.2 The Inconsistency, Circumstantial, Poisoning the Well, Positive Ad Hominem Fallacy

-9.2 The Genetic Fallacy, Straw Man

--9.2 The Genetic Fallacy, Straw Man

-9.3 False Dilemma, Argument from Analogy

--9.3 False Dilemma & Weak Analogy

-9.4 The Perfectionist Fallacy, The Line-Drawing Fallacy, Slippery Slope

--9.4 The Perfectionist Fallacy, The Line-Drawing Fallacy, Slippery Slope

-9.5 Misplacing the Burden of Proof, Begging the Question

--9.5 Misplacing the Burden of Proof, Begging the Question

-Quiz 9

-Lecture 9 Reading

10. Causal explanation

-10.1 Two Kinds of Explanations

--10.1 Two Kinds of Explanations

-10.2 Explanatory Adequacy

--10.2 Explanatory Adequacy

-10.3 Forming Hypotheses

--10.3.1-Method of Difference & Method of Agreement

--10.3.2-Causal Mechanisms and Background Knowledge

-10.4 Mistakes in Causal Reasoning

--10.4 Mistakes in Causal Reasoning

-Quiz 10

-Lecture 10 Reading

批判性思维开设学校:湖北大学

批判性思维授课教师:

邵立桢-讲师-湖北大学-

邵立桢,主讲。湖北大学国际教育学院教师,主要研究方向为传播学,从事相关专业课双语、全英文教学数十年。近年来主持或参与多项省级及校级教研项目,发表学术论文数篇。分别于2010年、2012年、2017年赴英国、澳大利亚进行长短期访学交流。曾多次获得湖北大学优秀教师称号,所授课程获得学生一致好评,教学效果显著。

鲍一晴-学生-湖北大学-

鲍一晴,湖北大学政法院2017级学生,曾获全国大学生艾滋病预防大赛优秀奖、CCTV希望之星英语风采大赛省三等奖、外研社英语演讲比赛初赛二等奖、湖北大学三等优秀学生奖学金等荣誉。2018年12月至今,作为湖北校媒成员,任湖北省委共青团官方微信公众号“青春湖北”编辑,并担任“青吟”栏目主播;参与“湖北大学”公众号运营,在任期间,运营团队荣获“中国大学官微50强”等多个团体奖项;2018年9月至今,任湖北大学政法院学生会学科部部长;2018年9月,被评为优秀留学生志愿者;2017年9月至今,任国务1701班学习委员。

也许你还感兴趣的课程:


  1. 医学心理干预(2021秋)

  2. 太极之从零开始(双语版)(2021暑假班)

  3. 科学健身法-缠丝健身功(2021秋)

  4. 消费者行为分析(2021秋)

  5. 历史建筑保护设计(2021秋)

  6. 会计师与企业(ACCA F1)(2021秋)

  7. 楚国历史与文化(2021秋)

  8. 医学的故事(2021秋)

  9. 智能证券投资(2021暑假班)

  10. 跨文化交际(2021暑假班)

  11. 批判性思维(2021秋)

  12. 国际贸易理论与实务(2021秋)

  13. 油画创作(2021秋)

  14. 网页设计与地图应用(2021秋)

  15. 社区护理(Community Health Nursing)(2021暑假班)

  16. 高级英语1(2021秋)

  17. 高等代数 I(2021秋)

  18. 医药英语词汇学(2021秋)

  19. 日语写作之实用篇(2021暑假班)

  20. 伦理学概论(2021秋)
© 柠檬大学-慕课导航 课程版权归原始院校所有,
本网站仅通过互联网进行慕课课程索引,不提供在线课程学习和视频,请同学们点击报名到课程提供网站进行学习。